What action should a reviewer take if they encounter a conflict in an appraisal methodology?

When a reviewer encounters a conflict in an appraisal methodology, requesting clarification and a reference from the appraiser is the most appropriate action. This approach fosters effective communication and allows the reviewer to understand the rationale behind the appraiser's chosen methodology. By asking for clarification, the reviewer can identify whether the conflict arises from a misunderstanding, an oversight, or if it is indeed a significant issue worth addressing. Additionally, obtaining a reference provides context and support for the methodology described, which aids in evaluating the validity and reliability of the appraisal process.

This is a constructive method that maintains professionalism and respect for the appraiser's work while still addressing potential concerns. The reviewer's actions could enhance the overall quality of the appraisal and ensure that any necessary adjustments are based on informed decisions rather than assumptions.