What is a key criterion for a reviewer when reporting on an appraisal consulting assignment?

A key criterion for a reviewer when reporting on an appraisal consulting assignment is the need to support the validity of the appraiser's work. This involves critically assessing the methodologies used, the data incorporated, and the overall conclusions drawn in the original appraisal report. The reviewer must ensure that the appraiser's approach adheres to established standards and guidelines, offering constructive feedback where applicable.

Supporting the validity of the appraiser's work enables the reviewer to confirm that the appraisal is reliable and credible. This also helps maintain the quality and integrity of the appraisal profession, ensuring that stakeholders can trust the outcomes of the appraisal process. By focusing on validating rather than merely critiquing the appraisal, the reviewer plays a crucial role in enhancing the overall appraisal quality and providing value to clients and stakeholders involved in the transaction or decision-making based on the appraisal.