When concluding a review of a well-executed appraisal, how should the reviewer phrase their conclusion?

The best approach for concluding a review of a well-executed appraisal is to acknowledge and affirm the quality of the appraisal process. When a reviewer states they have also appraised the property, it lends credibility to their conclusions. This statement implies that the reviewer has sufficient firsthand experience with the property and the appraisal practices being applied, which can enhance the trustworthiness and validity of their review. It establishes a context where the reviewer has a comprehensive understanding of the nuances involved, reinforcing their professional opinion on the accuracy and completeness of the original appraisal.

In contrast, expressing simple agreement offers little insight into the review process and may come off as superficial. Focusing solely on problems without acknowledging strengths could cast doubt on the appraisal's overall quality and may not foster constructive dialogue. Including certifications from USPAP standards, while important for compliance, does not address the substantive evaluation of the appraisal itself in the context of the review. Each of these alternatives fails to encapsulate the reviewer's firsthand perspective and expertise, which is crucial in providing a well-rounded conclusion.