Which of the following is NOT commonly made by review appraisers?

Review appraisers play a critical role in ensuring the accuracy and credibility of property valuations. They are tasked with evaluating the work of other appraisers to maintain quality and consistency in appraisals. Among the common issues they identify, failing to state extraordinary assumptions, misunderstanding the differences between recertification and update, and changing value conclusions without proper requirements are all concerns that can arise in the appraisal process.

Failing to state extraordinary assumptions means that the appraiser did not disclose assumptions that could significantly affect the value, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. Misunderstanding the terms "recertification" and "update" can result in improper procedures being followed, impacting the reliability of the appraisal. Similarly, changing value conclusions without adhering to the proper requirements signifies a lack of due diligence and can undermine the appraisal’s validity.

In contrast, failing to identify typical buyers for the property, while important in understanding market dynamics, is not typically criticized by review appraisers as often as the other issues mentioned. Identifying typical buyers can contribute to an appraisal's context but does not usually constitute a formal error in appraisal practice. As a result, this option stands out as it doesn't represent a standard mistake commonly made by review appraisers, hence why it is the correct choice for the