Which part of the appraisal review form is suitable for a desk review due to its scope?

The correct choice highlights that part one of the appraisal review form is suitable for a desk review because it does not include a separate value opinion. In this context, a desk review typically involves examining the information provided in the report without the necessity for an on-site inspection, and a value opinion can complicate this process. If part one merely compiles data, analyses, and reconciling methods, it allows the reviewer to assess the quality and accuracy of the appraisal based on available information without forming a new value opinion.

The distinction is essential because when a separate value opinion is included, it can require more critical analysis that may be suited for a more comprehensive review, potentially involving site visits or additional data collection. Thus, the absence of a separate value opinion in part one makes it straightforward and suitable for a desk review, where the reviewer can efficiently analyze compliance and soundness of the methodology used in the appraisal.

Other options do not accurately reflect the standards and practices of appraisal reviews, especially regarding the necessity of having sufficient data to evaluate different parts of the review form or the requirement for on-site inspection complexities.