Which types of reviews require both "passing judgment" and a site visit?

The correct choice indicates that reviews categorized as "Technical / field" necessitate both "passing judgment" on the appraisal's quality and a site visit to the property. This is because technical reviews involve a detailed analysis of the appraisal methods, assumptions, and compliance with standards, which often requires the reviewer to not only examine the report itself but also assess the property conditions and context in person.

A site visit allows the reviewer to gather firsthand information about the property, which is critical for making informed judgments about its valuation and the appropriateness of the methodologies used in the appraisal. This is particularly important for nuanced issues like condition, comparable sales, and local market factors that may not be entirely reflected in the appraisal report.

Other types of reviews may not require such thorough engagement. For instance, administrative or desk reviews focus more on compliance and basic checks, which could often be done without visiting the site. Instead, these types generally rely on the documents provided. In contrast, technical reviews require a deeper, more evaluative approach that benefits from a physical inspection to form a comprehensive judgment about the appraisal's accuracy and validity.